This settlement's filing deadline passed on June 9, 2026. Browse active settlements

Trader Joe's Class Action Settlement

This settlement covered people in California who received a printed payment card receipt from Trader Joe's showing more than the last five digits of the card number. Claims could be filed without proof, with an estimated payment of $100. The deadline was June 9, 2026, and claims are now closed.

Payout up to $100
Payment Subject to pro rata adjustment
Deadline June 9, 2026
Proof required No
Category Privacy
Administrator Keim v. Trader Joe's Company, Settlement Administrator
Updated September 5, 2026

Browse Active Settlements

What this settlement covers

California FACTA class: you received a print-out of payment card information from Trader Joe's Company in California that displayed more than the last five digits of the card number and did not comply with statutory truncation requirements.

What you can claim

Keim v. Trader Joe's Company (L.A. Super. Ct. Case No. 19STCV36790). Submit electronically or by mail postmarked by June 9, 2026. Questions: www.TJ-FACTASettlement.com or 1-888-444-7415.

How payment works

Payments were variable, so each claimant's share depended on the number of valid claims filed. The case was Keim v. Trader Joe's Company, No. 19STCV36790, in the Los Angeles Superior Court.

Filing this claim

The claim deadline passed on June 9, 2026, so the settlement administrator is no longer accepting claim forms. If you filed before the deadline, payment timing is set by the administrator, not by Sparrow.

Read the official settlement notice for the full terms and the administrator’s contact details.

The administrator was:

Keim v. Trader Joe's Company, Settlement Administrator
P.O. Box 301134
Los Angeles, CA 90030-1134

Trader Joe's Class Action Settlement FAQs

Common questions about this class action settlement.

Who was covered?

People who received a print-out of payment card information from Trader Joe's Company in California that displayed more than the last five digits of the card number and so did not comply with the statutory truncation requirement.

What is a truncation requirement?

The federal Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act requires a printed receipt to show no more than the last five digits of a card number. Printing more than that creates a claim on the face of the receipt, without the customer needing to show that anything was stolen.

Was proof required?

No. Claims could be filed without producing the receipt. That matters here because the document that establishes the violation is exactly the thing a shopper is most likely to have thrown away at the time.