This settlement's filing deadline passed on June 22, 2026. Browse active settlements

Krispy Kreme Class Action Settlement

This settlement covered people who received notice that their private information was affected by the Krispy Kreme data incident. Class members could claim documented fraud or identity theft losses up to $3,500, or an alternate payment estimated at up to $75 with no documentation. The deadline was June 22, 2026, and claims are now closed.

Payout up to $75
Payment Subject to pro rata adjustment
Deadline June 22, 2026
Proof required No
Category Data breach
Administrator Krispy Kreme Data Incident Settlement Administrator
Updated September 5, 2026

Browse Active Settlements

What this settlement covers

Received notice of the Krispy Kreme data incident affecting your private information

What you can claim

Cash Payment A: documented fraud or identity theft losses of up to $3,500, with reasonable documentation.
Cash Payment B: an alternate payment estimated at up to $75, with no documentation required.
Credit monitoring, available without filing the claim form.

How payment works

Payments could be adjusted pro rata depending on the number of valid claims filed. The case was In re Krispy Kreme Data Security Litigation, No. 3:25-cv-00434.

Filing this claim

The claim deadline passed on June 22, 2026, so the settlement administrator is no longer accepting claim forms. If you filed before the deadline, payment timing is set by the administrator, not by Sparrow.

Read the official settlement notice for the full terms and the administrator’s contact details.

The administrator was:

Krispy Kreme Data Incident Settlement Administrator
P.O. Box 2047
Portland, OR 97208-2047

Krispy Kreme Class Action Settlement FAQs

Common questions about this class action settlement.

Who was covered?

People who received notice of the Krispy Kreme data incident indicating that their private information was affected. The notice letter is what defined the class, which is the usual approach in a breach case since no individual can prove what was taken.

How did the two cash options differ?

Cash Payment A reimbursed documented fraud or identity theft losses up to $3,500 and required reasonable documentation. Cash Payment B was an alternate payment estimated at up to $75 with no documentation. A class member chose one, not both.

Was credit monitoring part of the claim?

No. Credit monitoring was available without filing the claim form at all, which is worth knowing: a class member who wanted only the monitoring did not need to complete a cash claim to get it.